Hi:
Is the flag -T1118 required to solve the problem described in
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328551, when you have SQL Server 2000 with
Service Pack 4, or it's unecessary?
I'm not sure if this is unecessary. I didn't see, anywhere, something
like "Hey, man, apply SP4, create multiple files for tempdb, and forget
the -T1118 flag, it's not required anymore...". The documentation says, in a
shy way, that's the problem is solved on SP4, but I've found places that
says to always create multiple files for tempdb.
What's the correct? Should I always have -T1118 applied or it's not
required?
TIA,
--
Ravi Wallau
nospam@.nospam.orgYou might want to do a feedback on that KB asking for clarification. Here's what is going on:
Trace flag 1118 will mean no allocations from mixed extents (except from IAM pages). This can
increase concurrency on your tempdb as it will decrease hit on the SGAM page.
The fix in the KB mean that several files for tempdb will be used in a round-robin fashion,
essentially spreading out SGAM hit over several files.
You can combine one with the other. Since eliminating mixed extents for data will mean increased
storage utilization, I recommend you go for the KB fix to start with. If you still feel you have
resource contention of the tempdb SGAM page, try adding trace flag 1118 as well.
We recently had a discussion in the MVP group on how the article is worded, but I have a feeling
that the discussion didn't trigger a re-wording in the article...
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Ravi Ambros Wallau" <nospam@.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OykXgqtRGHA.5900@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi:
> Is the flag -T1118 required to solve the problem described in
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328551, when you have SQL Server 2000 with Service Pack 4, or it's
> unecessary?
> I'm not sure if this is unecessary. I didn't see, anywhere, something like "Hey, man, apply
> SP4, create multiple files for tempdb, and forget the -T1118 flag, it's not required anymore...".
> The documentation says, in a shy way, that's the problem is solved on SP4, but I've found places
> that says to always create multiple files for tempdb.
> What's the correct? Should I always have -T1118 applied or it's not required?
> TIA,
> --
> Ravi Wallau
> nospam@.nospam.org
>sql
2012年3月21日星期三
2012年3月9日星期五
Fix to KB812995
Hi!
Does someone knows how to apply the fix described in
KB812995 on a SQL server 2000 with SP1?
Thanks,
Rey| Hi!
|
| Does someone knows how to apply the fix described in
| KB812995 on a SQL server 2000 with SP1?
--
Hi Rey,
Please clarify your question. Did you want the step by step procedure to
apply this hotfix or did you want to know how to obtain the hotfix?
To install the hotfix, you just run the hotfix.exe and the necessary files
will be updated. The hotfix installer is also cluster aware so you only
need to install it on the active node.
To obtain the hotfix, you need to lodge a case with Product Support.
Hope this helps,
--
Eric Cárdenas
SQL Server support
Does someone knows how to apply the fix described in
KB812995 on a SQL server 2000 with SP1?
Thanks,
Rey| Hi!
|
| Does someone knows how to apply the fix described in
| KB812995 on a SQL server 2000 with SP1?
--
Hi Rey,
Please clarify your question. Did you want the step by step procedure to
apply this hotfix or did you want to know how to obtain the hotfix?
To install the hotfix, you just run the hotfix.exe and the necessary files
will be updated. The hotfix installer is also cluster aware so you only
need to install it on the active node.
To obtain the hotfix, you need to lodge a case with Product Support.
Hope this helps,
--
Eric Cárdenas
SQL Server support
订阅:
博文 (Atom)