Hi,
I've just setup SQL Express 2005 SP2 on my fresh SBS 2003 R2 system. I never
had anything to do with and have no idea about SQL, the only reason for
updating from MSDE was the annoying and ugly event id 1000 relating to
sharepoint services in my application log. There seems to be no working
solution for that yet.
The point after upgrading to 2005 SP2 now is, that there is a total of seven
services related to SQL running on my machine. They are named
MSSQL$SBSMONITORING
MSSQL$SHAREPOINT
SQL Server (SQLEXPRESS)
SQL Server VSS Writer
SQL Server-Browser
SQLAgent$SBSMONITORING
SQLAgent$Sharepoint
Especially the duplicate services regarding SBS-Monitoring and Sharepoint
Services are eye-catchers to me. I thought updating to Express 2005 would
trail existing databases - or at least asks you whether to do. And in control
panel / software there are still two entries relating to MSDE as well.
Is that all alright? Could an SQL-MVP like me, who has no idea about SQL and
hates software cadavers on his system, remove "old" MSDE without crashing the
whole system?
Thanks in advance for a hint.
Regards,
Tim
By the way: at least after first reboot of the server there is everything
"blue" in application log! :-))
SQL Agent is essentially a part of SQL Server. It manages scheduled jobs,
alerts, etc. It cannot be removed from the corresponding SQL Server
instance. According to what I see, you have essentially 3 instances of SQL
Server running on your machine, one of which is SQL Express.
BTW, when did you become an MVP? I don't see you listed.
Tom
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canada
..
"Tim Meltzer" <TimMeltzer@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:C2C0D24F-1B83-43D3-B3FA-95C951907BAC@.microsoft.com...
Hi,
I've just setup SQL Express 2005 SP2 on my fresh SBS 2003 R2 system. I never
had anything to do with and have no idea about SQL, the only reason for
updating from MSDE was the annoying and ugly event id 1000 relating to
sharepoint services in my application log. There seems to be no working
solution for that yet.
The point after upgrading to 2005 SP2 now is, that there is a total of seven
services related to SQL running on my machine. They are named
MSSQL$SBSMONITORING
MSSQL$SHAREPOINT
SQL Server (SQLEXPRESS)
SQL Server VSS Writer
SQL Server-Browser
SQLAgent$SBSMONITORING
SQLAgent$Sharepoint
Especially the duplicate services regarding SBS-Monitoring and Sharepoint
Services are eye-catchers to me. I thought updating to Express 2005 would
trail existing databases - or at least asks you whether to do. And in
control
panel / software there are still two entries relating to MSDE as well.
Is that all alright? Could an SQL-MVP like me, who has no idea about SQL and
hates software cadavers on his system, remove "old" MSDE without crashing
the
whole system?
Thanks in advance for a hint.
Regards,
Tim
By the way: at least after first reboot of the server there is everything
"blue" in application log! :-))
sql
2012年3月29日星期四
2012年3月11日星期日
Fixed header rowin Reporting Services
Hi,
I've been devloping reports using Reporting Services. It's useful and fast.
However, I've this group of users who would like to fix the header row while
the data is able to scoll down and up without moving the header row. Is
there any configuration that can solve my problem? Below is a simple
illustration, hope anyone can help me in this.
| X header | Y header | Z header | ... | => This row must be fixed
| X data1 | Y data1 | Z data1 |... | ^
| X data2 | Y data2 | Z data2 |... | |
| X data3 | Y data3 | Z data3 |... | |
| X data4 | Y data4 | Z data4 |... | | These data rows
should be able to
| X data5 | Y data5 | Z data5 |... | | scroll up and down
| ........ | ........ | ........ |... | |
| X dataN | Y dataN | Z dataN |... | v
Best Regards,
Samie
I don't know how to do this.
I suspect that you will have a better response within the Reporting Services
newsgroup. I am including that group in this reply. Hopefully someone in
that group will be able to help.
Keith
"Samie" <Samie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D12C8438-E59D-49D5-9E2D-31C4D3A6B17C@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I've been devloping reports using Reporting Services. It's useful and
fast.
> However, I've this group of users who would like to fix the header row
while
> the data is able to scoll down and up without moving the header row. Is
> there any configuration that can solve my problem? Below is a simple
> illustration, hope anyone can help me in this.
> | X header | Y header | Z header | ... | => This row must be fixed
> | X data1 | Y data1 | Z data1 |... | ^
> | X data2 | Y data2 | Z data2 |... | |
> | X data3 | Y data3 | Z data3 |... | |
> | X data4 | Y data4 | Z data4 |... | | These data rows
> should be able to
> | X data5 | Y data5 | Z data5 |... | | scroll up and down
> | ........ | ........ | ........ |... | |
> | X dataN | Y dataN | Z dataN |... | v
>
> Best Regards,
> Samie
>
|||Thanks Keith...
I'm hoping someone can help me too.
Regards,
samie
"Keith Kratochvil" wrote:
> I don't know how to do this.
> I suspect that you will have a better response within the Reporting Services
> newsgroup. I am including that group in this reply. Hopefully someone in
> that group will be able to help.
> --
> Keith
>
> "Samie" <Samie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:D12C8438-E59D-49D5-9E2D-31C4D3A6B17C@.microsoft.com...
> fast.
> while
>
|||Samie,
Fixed headers are not supported with version 1.0 but on the wish list for
2005.
Hope this helps.
Teo Lachev, MVP [SQL Server], MCSD, MCT
Author: "Microsoft Reporting Services in Action"
Publisher website: http://www.manning.com/lachev
Buy it from Amazon.com: http://shrinkster.com/eq
Home page and blog: http://www.prologika.com/
"Samie" <Samie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:119F060E-C479-4AF6-97E2-B59600B8D383@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Thanks Keith...
> I'm hoping someone can help me too.
> Regards,
> samie
>
> "Keith Kratochvil" wrote:
Services[vbcol=seagreen]
in[vbcol=seagreen]
row[vbcol=seagreen]
Is[vbcol=seagreen]
fixed[vbcol=seagreen]
rows[vbcol=seagreen]
down[vbcol=seagreen]
I've been devloping reports using Reporting Services. It's useful and fast.
However, I've this group of users who would like to fix the header row while
the data is able to scoll down and up without moving the header row. Is
there any configuration that can solve my problem? Below is a simple
illustration, hope anyone can help me in this.
| X header | Y header | Z header | ... | => This row must be fixed
| X data1 | Y data1 | Z data1 |... | ^
| X data2 | Y data2 | Z data2 |... | |
| X data3 | Y data3 | Z data3 |... | |
| X data4 | Y data4 | Z data4 |... | | These data rows
should be able to
| X data5 | Y data5 | Z data5 |... | | scroll up and down
| ........ | ........ | ........ |... | |
| X dataN | Y dataN | Z dataN |... | v
Best Regards,
Samie
I don't know how to do this.
I suspect that you will have a better response within the Reporting Services
newsgroup. I am including that group in this reply. Hopefully someone in
that group will be able to help.
Keith
"Samie" <Samie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:D12C8438-E59D-49D5-9E2D-31C4D3A6B17C@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I've been devloping reports using Reporting Services. It's useful and
fast.
> However, I've this group of users who would like to fix the header row
while
> the data is able to scoll down and up without moving the header row. Is
> there any configuration that can solve my problem? Below is a simple
> illustration, hope anyone can help me in this.
> | X header | Y header | Z header | ... | => This row must be fixed
> | X data1 | Y data1 | Z data1 |... | ^
> | X data2 | Y data2 | Z data2 |... | |
> | X data3 | Y data3 | Z data3 |... | |
> | X data4 | Y data4 | Z data4 |... | | These data rows
> should be able to
> | X data5 | Y data5 | Z data5 |... | | scroll up and down
> | ........ | ........ | ........ |... | |
> | X dataN | Y dataN | Z dataN |... | v
>
> Best Regards,
> Samie
>
|||Thanks Keith...
I'm hoping someone can help me too.
Regards,
samie
"Keith Kratochvil" wrote:
> I don't know how to do this.
> I suspect that you will have a better response within the Reporting Services
> newsgroup. I am including that group in this reply. Hopefully someone in
> that group will be able to help.
> --
> Keith
>
> "Samie" <Samie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:D12C8438-E59D-49D5-9E2D-31C4D3A6B17C@.microsoft.com...
> fast.
> while
>
|||Samie,
Fixed headers are not supported with version 1.0 but on the wish list for
2005.
Hope this helps.
Teo Lachev, MVP [SQL Server], MCSD, MCT
Author: "Microsoft Reporting Services in Action"
Publisher website: http://www.manning.com/lachev
Buy it from Amazon.com: http://shrinkster.com/eq
Home page and blog: http://www.prologika.com/
"Samie" <Samie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:119F060E-C479-4AF6-97E2-B59600B8D383@.microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Thanks Keith...
> I'm hoping someone can help me too.
> Regards,
> samie
>
> "Keith Kratochvil" wrote:
Services[vbcol=seagreen]
in[vbcol=seagreen]
row[vbcol=seagreen]
Is[vbcol=seagreen]
fixed[vbcol=seagreen]
rows[vbcol=seagreen]
down[vbcol=seagreen]
2012年2月26日星期日
FIRST REPLICATION
Hi all,
I've 2 servers with 2 db that must have the same data...
I'm studing how to make replication, but is very difficult
for a novice.
The connection between the servers is 24h.
There some good book with samples step by step (for
dummies)?
thanks for any idea
dipic
What type of replication r u looking for ? Whether one would be your live database and the other would be just for backup , is that the case then you can got for Transactional replication where incremenatal data would be copied on to other server
|||Dipic,
there aren't any books particular to sql server replication, although I have
heard there will be two volumes coming out in the near future...
For now, I'd use books-on-line as your main resource, and there is a lot of
useful information there.
You have to consider if the subscribers can change the data and the degree
of latency allowed/accepted. This will narrow down your choices. BTW,
replication is not the same as database mirroring (see SQL 2005), so there
will always be some latency involved.
Post up in this group as much as you can - there are plenty of people here
with a lot of experience, and this will speed up your learning.
HTH,
Paul Ibison
|||http://www.mssqlserver.com/replication
When you set this up, do everything on a single machine. Why? The two
things that cause the greatest problems with replication are security and
connectivity. You rule both out on a single machine and can spend your time
getting comfortable with replication before you move to a multi-machine
environment.
Mike
Principal Mentor
Solid Quality Learning
"More than just Training"
SQL Server MVP
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com
http://www.mssqlserver.com
|||Both dbase are alive... people work on the first and on
the second server, and all must have the same data every
12h ca.
>--Original Message--
>What type of replication r u looking for ? Whether one
would be your live database and the other would be just
for backup , is that the case then you can got for
Transactional replication where incremenatal data would be
copied on to other server
>.
>
|||I've both the dbase alive (people working on), and the
data must be replicated from server1 to server2 and vice
versa, every 12h ca... but I'm totally novice and I don't
know what I must do... I'm searching some example, a
suggestion or a guide...
thanks for your reply
>--Original Message--
>http://www.mssqlserver.com/replication
>When you set this up, do everything on a single machine.
Why? The two
>things that cause the greatest problems with replication
are security and
>connectivity. You rule both out on a single machine and
can spend your time
>getting comfortable with replication before you move to a
multi-machine
>environment.
>--
>Mike
>Principal Mentor
>Solid Quality Learning
>"More than just Training"
>SQL Server MVP
>http://www.solidqualitylearning.com
>http://www.mssqlserver.com
>
>.
>
|||http://www.mssqlserver.com/replication
Mike
Principal Mentor
Solid Quality Learning
"More than just Training"
SQL Server MVP
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com
http://www.mssqlserver.com
I've 2 servers with 2 db that must have the same data...
I'm studing how to make replication, but is very difficult
for a novice.
The connection between the servers is 24h.
There some good book with samples step by step (for
dummies)?
thanks for any idea
dipic
What type of replication r u looking for ? Whether one would be your live database and the other would be just for backup , is that the case then you can got for Transactional replication where incremenatal data would be copied on to other server
|||Dipic,
there aren't any books particular to sql server replication, although I have
heard there will be two volumes coming out in the near future...
For now, I'd use books-on-line as your main resource, and there is a lot of
useful information there.
You have to consider if the subscribers can change the data and the degree
of latency allowed/accepted. This will narrow down your choices. BTW,
replication is not the same as database mirroring (see SQL 2005), so there
will always be some latency involved.
Post up in this group as much as you can - there are plenty of people here
with a lot of experience, and this will speed up your learning.
HTH,
Paul Ibison
|||http://www.mssqlserver.com/replication
When you set this up, do everything on a single machine. Why? The two
things that cause the greatest problems with replication are security and
connectivity. You rule both out on a single machine and can spend your time
getting comfortable with replication before you move to a multi-machine
environment.
Mike
Principal Mentor
Solid Quality Learning
"More than just Training"
SQL Server MVP
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com
http://www.mssqlserver.com
|||Both dbase are alive... people work on the first and on
the second server, and all must have the same data every
12h ca.
>--Original Message--
>What type of replication r u looking for ? Whether one
would be your live database and the other would be just
for backup , is that the case then you can got for
Transactional replication where incremenatal data would be
copied on to other server
>.
>
|||I've both the dbase alive (people working on), and the
data must be replicated from server1 to server2 and vice
versa, every 12h ca... but I'm totally novice and I don't
know what I must do... I'm searching some example, a
suggestion or a guide...
thanks for your reply
>--Original Message--
>http://www.mssqlserver.com/replication
>When you set this up, do everything on a single machine.
Why? The two
>things that cause the greatest problems with replication
are security and
>connectivity. You rule both out on a single machine and
can spend your time
>getting comfortable with replication before you move to a
multi-machine
>environment.
>--
>Mike
>Principal Mentor
>Solid Quality Learning
>"More than just Training"
>SQL Server MVP
>http://www.solidqualitylearning.com
>http://www.mssqlserver.com
>
>.
>
|||http://www.mssqlserver.com/replication
Mike
Principal Mentor
Solid Quality Learning
"More than just Training"
SQL Server MVP
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com
http://www.mssqlserver.com
订阅:
博文 (Atom)